God and Stephen Hawking by John C. Lennox

      Lennox’s book, God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design is it Anyway?, is a direct response to the latest book by scientist Stephen Hawking, called The Grand Design. Lennox uses his own knowledge of science and mathematics, as well as the knowledge of other highly regarded scientists, to refute the ideas presented in The Grand Design, of which the main purpose is to “disprove” the existence of God by proving the universe through science. Lennox quotes many scientists (some Christian, some atheist) who believe that Hawking’s theories are faulty, at best. Some of these are men who have even worked alongside Hawking.

Lennox first points out that “not all statements by scientists are statements of science, and so do not carry the authority of authentic science….” He even admits that this statement would then apply to him as well, and he asks us to scrutinize his arguments very carefully. Lennox goes on to cite the gross number of inconsistencies and contradictions in Hawking’s book. The first being that Hawking makes the statement that philosophy is dead very early on his book, but then uses philosophy many times during his explanations (or lack thereof, as the case may be). Lennox also points out that, for all his trying to disprove the existence of God, Hawking actually makes a few points that lead toward the idea of a supernatural creator of the universe.

Many atheist scientists would have us believe that it’s science versus God… one or the other. That each time they prove something with science, the idea of God disappears from our world that much more. This could not be more false, and Lennox shows this by quoting several highly regarded and award-winning scientists who are in fact Christians. Their knowledge of science does not reduce their faith in God, but enhances it as they study his handiwork.

Lennox has done an excellent job pointing out the fallacies of Hawking’s theories, more specifically the idea that Hawking has “disproved” God.

For purposes of scoring this book, I have obviously had to remove scoring on accuracy. I am not a physicist or a mathematician.

1) Is it understandable? = 5
2) Presentation of Information = 4.5
3) Accuracy = removed from average
4) Quality of Writing = 4.5
5) Overall Enjoyability = 5

Average of  score 4.75

Overall grade = A-

Where to buy the book: CBD | Amazon | B&N

I received a complimentary copy of this book for review purposes from LitFuse Group.

This was book 22 in my 52 Books in 52 Weeks challenge.

The Grand Design by Stephen Hawking

   The Grand Design is the first major work from Stephen Hawking in nearly ten years. With this new book, he sets out to answer the following questions:

1) Why is there something rather than nothing?
2) Why do we exist?
3) Why this particular set of laws and not some other?

We are promised that, unlike the answer given in Douglas Adam’s The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, his answer will not be “42.” Though I dare say it may as well have been.

By the end of this book, and in all honestly well before the end, it becomes quite clear that the entire purpose for writing it was to disprove the existence of a supernatural creator of the universe. Most of the book is spent discussing background to the new M-theory, and pointing out creation stories from different religions and cultures throughout history. The scientific background was very interesting, and is really like a refresher course going over theories brought forward by Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Einstein and more. The last few pages of the last section of the book are really the only place there is a solid presentation of the M-theory, which, from what I can tell, comes down to, “Because there is a law like gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing….” Which, of course, is not a new theory at all. The new concept here is that there may be no one set of laws that govern the entire universe. Several sets of laws may be needed to explain the universe as a whole, so long as those sets of laws agree where they overlap. This is the M-theory. It is also claimed, that according to M-theory, there are several histories of the universe all occurring at the same time and that our observation of our universe affects the history and not the other way around. Just how this happens, he never really explains.

The 3 questions posed at the beginning are never really answered:

1) “Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing.” – Even if I believed in this explanation, this answer would really be better suited for “how” is there something rather than nothing and leaves us open to more questions such as “what causes spontaneous creation?” and “how, again, does something come from nothing?” If gravity if the cause of a universe just “popping” into existence, but there was nothing there but gravity, what exactly was the gravity acting upon? And if the force of gravity existed, was there really nothing? How did gravity exist?

2) The same answer is given for why we exist. Again, this answers more “how” than “why.”

3) After a recap of what the ultimate theory of everything needs to include, we are told, “For these reasons M-theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the universe…. We must be part of this universe, because there is no other consistent model.” This, after the short one-paragraph recap, sounds like a big scientific because-I-said-so. And I also find it funny that a scientist of any kind would give this as an answer to anything. We’re basically being told, “this is the closest explanation we have, so we’re going with it.” And this is still a theory; Hawking states that it has yet to be proven if the theory is finite, which it must be.

As a lover of both God and science, I become more and more upset over the route science is taking. This atheistic view believes that if something can be proven by science then it disproves God and “religion” as a whole. By Hawking’s own admission, one set of laws may not account for all of creation. It is quite possible to explain our world through science. We can explain how bees pollinate flowers, but could it be that God created bees for just that purpose? That he set that process in motion at creation? Even if we finally get to the point where science can say exactly, without a doubt, what happened at the moment the universe came into existence… could it be that it is just our way of explaining what occurred at the moment God called the world into existence? How is belief in an alternate history, that is currently going on at this moment, any less “absurd” than belief in a supernatural creator?

The only thing that saved this book at all for me was the discussion of scientific history, which filled the book almost completely.

For purposes of scoring this book, I have obviously had to remove scoring on accuracy. I am not a physicist or a mathematician.

1) Is it understandable? = 4
2) Presentation of Information = 3
3) Accuracy = removed from average
4) Quality of Writing = 3.5
5) Overall Enjoyability = 2

Average of  score 3.1

Overall grade = C

Where to buy the book: Amazon | B&N

This was book 21 in my 52 Books in 52 Weeks challenge.

Monday Mash-up 5/16/11

Check out 25 manners every kid should know by age 9… and most adults need to learn these too.

Take a look at the world’s best ruins… including Petra!

This is hysterical! If God had a Facebook, what would his feed look like?

Physicist Stephen Hawking says after-life is just a fairy story. I still don’t understand why so many people think you either believe in God or trust in science… that they can’t mesh. I love science and know we can learn a lot about ourselves and our world with science, but it doesn’t negate my belief in God. It also angers and saddens me that scientists refuse to accept any evidence of anything unless it disproves (at least in their minds) the existence of God. Scientists will say that the world is self-sustaining so it could emerge from nothing and therefore did not need a creator. Does it not occur to them that the world’s creator created it to be self-sustaining? Does it not occur to them that when God created light, it didn’t start at the beginning of its path, but it immediately filled the universe to its fullest function? I believe that God gave us minds to study science as a way of understanding our world, and even Him in a better way. I believe that science if the study of God’s creation functions. I praise You because I am fearfully and wonderfully made!

Check out info on public libraries, and find your local library. Go read!

Make sure to watch Red Skelton’s Pledge of Allegiance from 1969, below:

Galileo by Mitch Stokes

     One of the books in the Christian Encounters series published by Thomas Nelson, Mitch Stokes’s Galileo is a thorough biography of the career and personal life of Galileo Galilei. Drawing upon several historical sources, Stokes separates fact from legend and gives us insight into one of the most important figures in the world of science. We see him not only as scientist and mathematician, but as father, friend, and lover of God.

     This is the first book I’ve read from the Christian Encounters series, and I think it’s a wonderful idea. Galileo is a wonderful addition. I’ve always loved science and astronomy, and I knew about Galileo, of course, from various science classes over the years, but I learned a lot about Galileo that I didn’t know. Especially in regards to his personal life, an area in which I knew nothing about him. Mitch Stokes tells Galileo’s story in an interesting and captivating way. I never thought that I’d say a biography is a page-turner, but this one is.

1) Is it understandable? = 5
2) Presentation of Information = 5
3) Accuracy = removed from average
4) Quality of Writing = 5
5) Overall Enjoyability = 5

Average of  score 5

Overall grade = A

Where to buy the book: CBD | Amazon | Thomas Nelson

I currently have no video review for this book.

I received a complimentary copy of this book for review purposes from BookSneeze.

This was book 14 in my 52 Books in 52 Weeks challenge.